Security testers and the value of experience
We have been hiring a lot of people recently, and it reopened a long-standing debate. How important are long years of hands-on experience when recruiting a security tester?
There is value in recruiting a security tester who has real-world experience in the field:
- The ramp up time for the person to skill up is minimized.
- He/she has developed the discipline required for testing.
- The tester is familiar with a number of platforms already.
- Having seen the practical problems testers face, the person has clearer expectations from the job. [It’s not “just hacking”!]
But long years of experience is less important in security testing than in several other fields. In areas where change is relatively slow, 10 years of experience is vastly better than one. In security testing, new techniques and tools are being added so rapidly that even the experienced tester is constantly learning new things to keep abreast.
In such a situation, it is better to look for the ability to learn and apply new knowledge than to count the years of experience during recruitment.
Plynt provides penetration testing and code review services to clients worldwide. If you are interested, please contact us for a quote. We’ll get back to you within one working day.Add yours.closed for this post.
Monthly Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
Syndication
You can read full entries of Palisade Blog using an RSS reader. Use this link —



